E 'in these days of debate in parliament, the notorious security package with all urgency provisions by the majority Government. Now the need for legislation is usually called the state of deterioration that Italy is experiencing at this time (situation, in my opinion, not too new, but threw in the true sense of the word, in the first page of who holds the information in this country). The danger is that, as usually happens, try to exploit the unease calvalcando the best wave of sick people. I certainly do not discuss the surgery, among other matters in a desire to ensure strict and above all some, what you do not agree with is the ease with which you can widen the scope of analysis by introducing some amendments presented as absurd (and approved) in parliament. It 's the case on the senator. D'Alia who brought (him or his ?!?!?) the ability to gag, without any right to due process, any website that may fall between the extremes of the crime of apology or instigation electronically. The intentions of the poor senator can also be the best, but this is not anything to take into account the fact that repression is complete. In fact, the closure of S "criminal" is immediate and this is to introduce a first step toward censorship of what is still a land free from the control of power. We truly believe that this provision is really aimed at safeguarding the people of the net from the incitement of a few fanatics? We are confident that this is not another attempt to silence those who are considered to be uncomfortable? That small minority of people who hail enhanced false idols (be they Mafia, Nazis, fascists, communists) can certainly be fought with methods different from those proposed in Parliament. And certainly no substitute for judicial body and not eliminate that right granted to all citizens who goes by the name of right to defense. why I oppose the attempt to replace the freedom of thought with freedom of censorship.
0 comments:
Post a Comment